Sunday, January 31, 2016
NOS(E) Winners for 2015/2016
The NOS(E) Award
announced winners last
week: the jury prize went to Danila Zaitsev’s Повесть
и житие Данилы Терентьевича Зайцева (The Life and Tale of Danila Terentyevich Zaitsev), which I
described like this in previous posts: “In which a Russian Old Believer born in
China and living in Argentina tells his story. A Yasnaya Polyana Award finalist
and Booker longlister.” The text of the first two (of seven) handwritten
notebooks that make up the book—it’s 712 pages (long) in the printed version—is available on Журнальный зал: part 1 and part 2. Based on what
I’ve heard and read about the book, the language may be the most interesting part:
the manuscript was prepared for publication by Olga Rovnova, a linguist who researches
the language of Old Believers in South America.
This year’s readers’ choice award went to Ekaterina Margolis
for Следы на воде (perhaps Ripples in the
Water? or maybe the wake behind a boat or, say, a gondola?). In an earlier post,
I called it “an autobiographical book with Venice. And Moscow. And the ‘river
of human lives,’ as the book’s description says. (excerpt).” Perhaps most interesting
about this win is that Margolis’s book was on the NOS(E) longlist but didn’t
make the shortlist. Hmm.
Up Next: Alisa
Ganieva’s Bride and Groom.
Posted by
Lisa C. Hayden
at
5:18 PM
1 comments
Labels: contemporary fiction, Danila Zaitsev, NOSE Award, religion
Sunday, January 24, 2016
Abracadabra, Anyone?: Nosov’s Curly Brackets
I guess the best brief summary of my feelings about Sergei Nosov’s
Фигурные скобки
(Curly Brackets) would be something like
“an enjoyable disappointment.” Enjoyable because I enjoy Nosov’s humor and am a
sucker for some good existential, metaphysical comedy set at a conference in
wintry St. Petersburg. But a disappointment because Curly Brackets felt a little flawed, structurally speaking. I don’t
begrudge Nosov the National Bestseller prize he received last year: as
I mentioned back when the NatsBest was awarded, he’s been a finalist for
several prizes over the years, so the NatsBest feels more like an award for a
successful decade than recognition for just one book.
And so. Curly Brackets
concerns a mathematician, Kapitonov, who travels to St. Petersburg for a magician
conference. These aren’t just any magicians, though, they’re micromagicians, people
who do close-up magic (there’s
a bit in English on Wikipedia) rather than events on large stages. Beyond that,
our Kapitonov is mentalist,
someone who figures out (literally) what two-digit numeral a person is thinking
of. The conference attracts quite a group of characters, including The Architect
of Events, The Devourer of Time, and Mister Necromancer. Nosov certainly did this
reader a favor by making sure Kapitonov was as clueless about his colleagues as
I: that gave Nosov a nice chance to explain micromagic in ways that feel
organic to the book’s plot.
And then there’s the conference swag, which includes a little
suitcase with a magic wand—the wand’s even labeled, probably because it’s just
a run-of-the-mill chopstick, which makes it doubly magical, I suppose—and a
copy of a book that surely must be Тайная жизнь петербургских памятников (The Secret Lives of
Petersburg Monuments). None other than Sergei Nosov wrote a book with that
title; Nosov loves slipping something meta into his novels. Beyond that, there
are conference details, formal meetings and sessions, awkward conversations among
people who don’t know each other, and Vodoemov, the somewhat mysterious and
nefarious organizer who invited Kapitonov and tries to push him into a
leadership position. What makes this conference unlike most others—beyond micromagicians
showing off—is that there’s also a death that involves mentalism. Can comments
from a necromancer be far behind?!
What didn’t work for me in Curly Brackets (and, yes, I’m oversimplifying here) is the chunk of the book from which the title is
taken: while in Petersburg, Kapitonov visits with a friend, who gives him
her deceased husband’s journal to read. He claims to have been taken
over by an outside force and made into someone other than himself. He’s found a
peculiar loophole, though: whatever he writes in triple curly brackets remains
secret from that force. The journal has some moderately interesting moments—and
feels like it had potential to become its own book—but, within the context of Curly Brackets, the novel, I found it
utterly and immediately forgettable. I wanted to get back to the conference, its quirky little details, and its characters, all of which felt far more intriguing and more entertaining,
thanks to Nosov’s ability to create a form of absurdity that’s simultaneously believable
and fantastical, funny and tragic, and, somehow, very Petersburg, too. I suppose
those contradictions that aren’t contradictions make my “enjoyable
disappointment” feel all the more fitting.
Up Next: NOS(E) Award winners. Alisa Ganieva’s Bride and Groom,
which is already making me hungry to search up recipes for traditional Dagestani
foods…
Posted by
Lisa C. Hayden
at
7:53 PM
2
comments
Labels: contemporary fiction, Sergei Nosov
Sunday, January 17, 2016
The Reading Sails on with Buida’s Ceylon
I might not call Yuri Buida’s Цейлон (Ceylon) the author’s headiest or most
metaphysical novel—I definitely prefer both his Blue
Blood and Zero
Train—but Ceylon, like Poison
and Honey, his previous book,
is thoroughly readable and enjoyable. Lots of Ceylon felt familiar after reading several other Buida novels: part
of my enjoyment, I suspect, came from just that because I love observing how authors
reuse structures and tropes in various books. That familiarity may also help
explain why I think Ceylon feels more
accessible and mainstream (these aren’t bad words!) to me than, say, his Blue Blood or Zero Train, though I suspect—it’s been too long since I read those
books to feel safe saying “I think”—Ceylon
is less densely packed than those books, making it easier to read.
As with Blue Blood
and Poison and Honey, a family home feels
like a key character in Ceylon: in
this case, as in Poison, there’s a
house on a hill. The area it’s in is known as “Ceylon,” which reminds of how a building
in Blue Blood is known as “Africa.” Both
those names are introduced early in their respective novels, leading to
questions about the origins of the building names. In the case of Ceylon, named
thusly by a traveler in the eighteenth century enamored of the island, there were
early attempts to dress up dogs as tigers, boys as monkeys, and wooden
structures as palm trees. Not quite a tropical paradise but an attempt at
paradise nevertheless and (long story short, since of course there’s much more to
things) the place, though not the original house, which burned, is now home to the Cherepin
family, five generations of which are described in varying levels of detail in
the book by Andrei Ilyich Cherepin, a first-person narrator who’s genial and,
though heavily involved in events, feels surprisingly reliable.
As one might guess, the words “magical realism” are often
used in conjunction with the name “Yuri Buida” and elements like the odd family
house and a character named Stoletov (hmm, sto=hundred and let=years) flashed little
“subtext?!” lights even for me, one of those rare literary losers who couldn’t quite
bring herself to finish One Hundred Years
of Solitude. (Aside: I don’t know why. All I can say is that I approached it
with dread. But will try again. Some year.) Ceylon,
though, feels almost more like some form of “absurd realism” or at least “quirky
realism” to me, what with brothers on opposite sides at revolution time—this,
by the way, feels like another case of attempts at paradise, of which there are
many in Ceylon and Ceylon, including
through marriage—and a taxidermied bear and unlikely loves and a woman dancing
the lambada at the grave of
her son, who died in Chechnya. There’s lots of everyday oddity. And I nearly
forgot the big elm tree growing through the house. A sort of family tree.
There’s a lot of history, too: Andrei’s first job is at a
dig, where he charms all the young women, he goes on to be a teacher, work at the
local museum, and write his dissertation about local history that includes his
family. Digs and cultural
layers come up a lot in contemporary Russian fiction and Buida piles together
Russian history, local history, and family history for the reader to dig through, working in the two brothers’
conflicts about the revolution—I mention this again because I thought it’s one
of the strongest and best-integrated subplots in the book, with its combination
of “big” history and family history—the military-industrial complex, whose
secrets another family member keeps; the crime-ridden banditry of the nineties;
the wars in Chechnya; and even the conflict in Ukraine. Some of these chunks of
history are more successful than others, I think: as often happens in fiction,
particularly family sagas that draw on and reflect a country’s history, more
distant events usually feel better contextualized and grounded than those more
recent.
In the end, though, the town cemetery, known as Red
Mountain, felt almost more significant to me than Ceylon, both because Andrei speaks,
early on, of his youthful hope for immortality and because his grandfather has
taken on a gigantic cemetery renovation project (financed in a way that doesn’t
sound perfectly legal) that dovetails nicely with Andrei’s thoughts about the
afterlife at the end of the book, when he’s the father of three (almost four) children
and has described rather dramatic losses of family members. There’s a lot of
mortality in Ceylon but also lots of birth.
I’d have to make a long, Buidaesque list to cover all the
other important elements of the book that I haven’t mentioned here: I’d
certainly include characters, romances, and family rivalries. I’ll skip the
list, though, and say that Ceylon may
be a little lumpy in its treatment of various generations, and their characters
and situations don’t feel as evenly developed as they might, but, to repeat, I enjoyed the book, and I think one reason is because I thoroughly appreciate
Buida’s ability to incorporate discussion of history into dialogue without getting bogged down. There are conversations
about how Russians carry on when the world’s falling apart, about justifying
Stalinism, about crazy “what ifs” when people have wild ideas, and plenty more.
And damn if it doesn’t feel pretty balanced and disciplined—by which I mean contextualized, natural
(!), and brief—without giving short shrift to the big questions at hand, many
of which are already pretty familiar even to me, a non-Russian reader.
Up next: I still have
Sergei Nosov’s Curly Brackets waiting
to be written about. And then there will be whatever I start tonight… most
likely Alisa Ganieva’s Bride and Groom,
though the groom comes first in the Russian title.
Disclaimers and
disclosures: The
usual. I received an electronic copy of Ceylon
from Elkost, Buida’s literary agency, for which I say thank you. But I bought a
printed copy to read after reading the very beginning of the electronic file.
Posted by
Lisa C. Hayden
at
7:05 PM
0
comments
Labels: contemporary fiction, Iurii Buida
Thursday, December 31, 2015
Happy New Year! & 2015 Highlights
It’s a mystery to me how 2015 managed to slip by so quickly,
but here I am, yet again, with holiday greetings. Happy new year! С Новым годом! For at least the third year
in a row, the reading situation has been quality over quantity with lots of
abandonments but also a fair number of books I’ve enjoyed. It’s been another
busy year of translation, too. Here are a few highlights in categories that I’ve
(as always!) fashioned to fit what I enjoyed most:
Favorite travel.
This is tough because I always enjoy the American Literary Translators
Association annual conference… but I think Russian
Literature Week, which brought me to New York earlier this month, had that
beat. Not only did I love being part of a Bridge
Series event with Eugene Vodolazkin, about Лавр/Laurus, at BookCourt
in Brooklyn, and moderated by Sal Robinson, but it was fun moderating a
roundtable at the Brooklyn Public Library with Vodolazkin, Vladimir Sharov, and
Dmitry Petrov, too. Of course it was great to just have a chance to spend time in
balmy New York (60 degrees F!) with them, Leonid Yuzefovich, translators Marian
Schwartz and Oliver Ready, and many, many other translators, writers, readers, publishers,
and other colleagues from New York, Moscow, and beyond. My memories of the week
are so horribly skewed from being a part of two events—even when I attended
events I wasn’t involved in, I was thinking about how anything Sharov and
Vodolazkin said might apply to our roundtable—that I’m thoroughly incapable of
writing a trip report, so I’ll just say here that it was all great fun. And
that sitting under a warm December sun in the middle of Broadway or walking
around Central Park talking about Russian books is pretty nice.
Favorite debut novel.
Guzel Yakhina’s Zuleikha Opens Her
Eyes (previous
post) was one of my favorite books of the year and, as I’ve noted before,
my enjoyment of the book only grew when I translated excerpts for Elkost, Yakhina’s literary agency.
I still don’t quite understand how Yakhina makes a book about the exile of a
kulak woman into such a lovely, affecting novel, but I’m going to just chalk that up
to the magic of fiction. As I’ve said before, Zuleikha certainly deserves the praise and awards—the Yasnaya
Polyana and Big Book—that it has won. It was a pleasure to rank Zuleikha highest on my Big Book ballot in
my first year as a voting jury member.
Favorite book by a
writer I’d already read. Marina Stepnova’s Italian Lessons (Безбожный переулок in Russian) (previous
post), which I’m happy to say I’ll start translating in March for World
Editions, publisher of my translation of Stepnova’s The Women of Lazarus, released this September. (You can read about Stepnova
and The Women of Lazarus here,
in a comprehensive piece by Phoebe Taplin.) Anyway! Italian Lessons tells of a love triangle but is, more than anything,
put broadly, hmm (particularly since I might change my mind after translating),
a novel about the difficulties of contemporary Russian life. With background, food,
travel, and lots of literary references I can’t wait to sort through.
Favorite children’s
book. I don’t read many children’s books but I did read two this year… and
I enjoyed Anna Starobinets’s Catlantis (previous
post) so much that I had to mention it, particularly since Pushkin Press recently published
Jane Bugaeva’s English translation. I read the Russian but—knowing Jane, her love
for cats, and her love for linguistic fun—I’m certain the translation is just
as much fun as the original. If you’re looking for a chapter book about a love-struck,
time-traveling cat, search no further than Catlantis!
Favorite book I haven’t
finished. Valerii Zalotukha’s The
Candle (Свечка), my second-place Big Book book.
Weighing in at about 1,850 pages, I admit I still haven’t finished the book,
though with its combination of the Moscow nineties, references to War and Peace, and themes of criminal
activity and sociocultural wreckage, I might love to be stuck in The Candle for years. I’ve read at least
one novel’s worth already, in binges and in small bits, and love how easy it is
to enjoy The Candle however I read. A
post will be coming whenever.
| Signing books at The Strand! |
Happiest mood. What
seems to stick most about 2015 is how good the year was to me and my books.
Three of my translations were released—Vladislav Otroshenko’s Addendum
to a Photo Album, Stepnova’s Women
of Lazarus, and Vodolazkin’s Laurus—and
all have had nice reviews on reader blogs, in publications like The TLS, and even in the wonderfully hybrid
New Yorker Page-Turner blog, where Ken
Kalfus’s “Holy
Foolery,” about Laurus, helped
the book find many, many readers. And that, I have to say, is one of the reasons
I love this translation thing so much to begin with: beyond the fun of
translation itself and the very humbling honor of becoming a writer’s English-language voice,
I love being able to help books reach new readers. And that, I think is the
perfect place to end 2015, though only blog-wise since there is still a little food, wine, and reading to go. And I do want to say how much I’m
looking forward to next year’s books, too: Vadim Levental’s Masha Regina and Vodolazin’s Solovyov
and Larionov, which, like Laurus,
will be published by Oneworld
Publications.
More finally: another
thank you! Thank you for visiting the blog, whether you come by regularly
or occasionally. I hope you continue to enjoy it and I wish you a very happy,
healthy, and book-filled 2016!
Up Next: Sergei
Nosov’s Curly Brackets, Yurii Buida’s
Ceylon, and who knows what else… there
are shelves and shelves of books hanging around, waiting to be read!
Disclaimers: The
usual.
Image credit: Fireworks
in Bratislava, New Year 2005, from Ondrejk, via Wikipedia.
Book signing, publicist Becky Kraemer.
Posted by
Lisa C. Hayden
at
8:44 PM
1 comments
Labels: Anna Starobinets, awards, Evgenii Vodolazkin, Guzel Yakhina, literary translation, Marina Stepnova, Russian literature week, valerii Zalotukha
Sunday, December 27, 2015
Getting Off the Island: Vagner’s Truly Human
Sequels are always tough so I have to admit I began Yana Vagner’s Живые люди—which her agents call Truly Human, rather than the more literal and far more awkward Living People—with a bit of trepidation.
I loved Vagner’s Vongozero (previous
post) for its road journey: a group of people leaves Moscow for a remote
island near the Russian-Finnish border, to escape a killer virus. There’s lots
of snow. Most of the genres I mentioned before—psychological thriller, race for
survival, and horror story—are still in force for Truly Human, but road story is replaced by a version of hermetic fiction this
time. Hermetic seals
are, of course, always just waiting to burst…
There’s snow on the island in Truly Human, too, since it’s still winter: Truly Human tells what happens when the road trip ends and the
motley group of people settles in. The narrator is again Anya, a
thirty-something woman who’s married to Sergei and is mother to teenage Misha. She’s
crammed into a tiny house with her overbearing father-in-law, three neighbors from
her old life (they’re still annoying), Sergei’s ex-wife and their child, and one
other couple. There’s also a dog. Once again, Vagner’s writing is plain and
very appropriate to her book’s events. This time she depicts a Spartan lifestyle:
not only do the cigarettes run out but there’s lots of ice fishing, sleeping on
uncomfortable-sounding beds, and sharing small spaces with people Anya doesn’t like
very much.
I think that’s what I enjoyed most about Truly Human: Anya’s honesty about her companions.
Some of them are shadowy here, barely described, reflecting their places in her
consciousness. Or lack thereof: sometimes it feels like she simply wants to
will them out of existence. With its island setting, Truly Human begins as a pretty hermetically sealed book but Vagner
works in three new neighbors on the shore; one of them seems especially threatening,
which starts building some slow suspense. It’s worth noting that the Chekhovian
guns present in Vongozero haven’t
exactly been thrown in the lake. Nor have most of the other post-cataclysmic,
existential threats one might expect, like hunger, boredom, thin ice, and illness.
Vagner covers most of that, too, again starting off slowly but quickening her
pace.
Although there’s a distinct sense here of hell being other people
(that’s one side of being “truly human” and “living people,” isn’t it?) Vagner
also shows the women drinking by a campfire (there’s a nice mess of trout that
day) and telling stories about their lives before the virus. And later, when
the first of the group dies, everyone mourns not only that person but their other
loved ones: to paraphrase, nobody had time to mourn the sharp feelings of loss
they’d brought with them to the island. Anya may not always be a sympathetic
character or narrator but she’s insightful and very, very real. And human, too,
as emotions and plotlines heat up when all sorts of calamities hit. And how
could they not? The food’s bound to run out, spring and migrating ducks come
late to northern Russia, and the three guys on shore always looked a little
sketchy. Even if I didn’t love Truly
Human quite as much as Vongozero—which
I’d expected after finding Vongozero so
oddly magical—I have to admire Vagner’s ability to put her characters in a
small house without much food, space, or privacy. And to let them sort things
out in ways that felt, well, pretty truly human to me.
Up Next: Year-end
summary, Sergei Nosov’s Curly Brackets,
and likely Yuri Buida’s Ceylon, which
I started yesterday and which feels a little like comfortable old (but not
smelly) slippers.
Posted by
Lisa C. Hayden
at
4:59 PM
0
comments
Labels: contemporary fiction, Yana Vagner
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

