I think I’ve mentioned many times that I love literary
genres, from eighteenth-century Russian sentimentalism to socialist realism to
all sorts of detective and science fiction/fantasy/weird novels. That’s not an
exhaustive list; I’m open to any century, old or new. It’s not the labelling I’m
enamored with: I love recognizing familiar patterns as I read and I love watching
authors play with (perceived) genre norms in their books. I’m sure that’s why I
sped through Boris Akunin’s first seven or eight Fandorin novels and why
Jonathan Lethem’s Motherless Brooklyn is such a favorite. As are Karamzin’s “Poor
Liza” and Pushkin’s Belkin Tales, too. How the Steel Was Tempered
and Cement weren’t required socialist realism reading in
college but I devoured them anyway. I could list dozens more books but will
say instead that I started early,
reading lots of science fiction and fantasy chapter books as a kid, and
revisiting Madeleine L’Engle’s A
Wrinkle in Time over and over.
I never stopped
reading detective novels or books with varying degrees of fantasy and/or
science fiction elements – they’re wonderfully endemic in contemporary
literature – but I’ve found myself gravitating to them more than usual during
the pandemic. Genres particularly draw me because of their adherence (sometimes
loose, sometimes close) to certain strictures, things like pacing standards,
typical plot twists, and stock characters. Many of Vladimir Propp’s fairy tale elements
apply to contemporary novels, too, and I see genres and archetypes as close, friendly
cousins. As I mentioned above, I especially like reading books that blend and
twist genre norms: these days, the combination of pattern recognition and unexpected
mashups of familiar storylines, characters, and tropes feels more satisfying
than ever. I’d even been planning a sort of genrefest for myself: the idea came
when I ordered a small heap of socialist realism and fantasy novels. Then the books
got set aside when some manuscripts and books for review floated in.
One of the first
manuscripts was Eugene Vodolazkin’s Оправдание
Острова (which I’ve seen called The History of Island), a fantastic (on all counts) blend of
medieval chronicle and what, hm, I might call fantasy, given that certain
characters live a very long time. Island tells historical and personal stories of
strife, isolation (perfect for a pandemic!), and development. There are two
timelines. One follows the chronicle and details centuries of Island history,
the other is a more anecdotal and (ha) cinematic account from two centuries-old
characters. I’ve long thought of Vodolazkin’s novels, which present spiralized time
and wrinkled history, as a personal Vodolazkin genre: I’ve called his Solovyov and Larionov, Laurus, and The Aviator a triptych but
have now officially expanded that to a quadriptych, thanks to Island. Island is delicate and detailed so not my ideal book
to blog about after electronic reading. Although it’s easy to remember the basics, Island is the sort of book that inspires dozens of notes,
exclamation marks (talking animals!), and smiling marginalia on paper I can flip
through, to recall and revisit favorite spots. I do see an upside in this: I
want/plan to reread Island in print so I can examine the novel’s
multiple layers and themes before writing more about it.
Marina and Sergey Dyachenko’s Vita Nostra was in my
genrefest pile of printed books, a good thing since I read it in lengthy binges.
It’s a page-turner. I’ve seen Vita Nostra described as “urban fantasy” and that
does sound about right. Beyond fantasy and the supernatural, though, there’s
also a nice coming-of-age story as Sashka Samokhina finds her true powers at
the Institute of Special Technologies, a school where (warning: slight spoilers
ahead!) student development includes (literal) metamorphoses. And time can go
into repeat mode. (Another slight spoiler: at one point, Sashka relives
December 16 for many days in a row. Reading that section of the book on the
very same date felt a bit creepy.) There was lots more to keep me binging with Vita
Nostra: Sashka is a strong young heroine, there’s mental training and
discipline, the alternate world/universe is vivid, and there are language-related
revelations toward the end that made me want to go right back to the beginning
of the novel and read it again. I read Vita Nostra in Russian, but it’s also
available in Julia
Meitov Hersey’s translation from HarperCollins.
For better or worse, I didn’t go back to reread Vita Nostra. I switched to a
retro detective novel instead. Valeria Verbinina’s Театральная площадь (Theater
Square), the second in Verbinina’s series starring detective Ivan Opalin,
was also in my genre shipment. I didn’t find Theater Square as absorbing
as its predecessor, Moscow Time (previous
post), but I’m a sucker for Stalin-era settings and the didactic layer of
Verbinina’s novels fascinates me. Sometimes it almost feels as if she makes sure
to mention things like Stalin portraits hanging in offices and accusations of
Trotskyite activity to remind readers (particularly young readers who haven’t
heard stories first-hand from relatives?) about Soviet-era history. And
communal apartments. Theater Square isn’t just history + detective,
though. It also involves the Bolshoy Ballet, making it a ballet novel as well.
Both Theater Square and Yulia Yakovleva’s Каннибалы – literally
Cannibals but a.k.a. The Dazzlings, a
contemporary novel about strange happenings at the Bolshoy (that I didn’t
finish) – include strong reminders about the interconnection of politics and
theater, too, as well as the building’s looping labyrinths. Among other things,
Theater Square includes a cameo with Stalin and there are romantic and
even somewhat gothic subplots. Bonus: Krasnaya Moskva (Red Moscow) perfume is mentioned
again, earning the novel a tag! On a personal note, I loved the description of the upper tier of Bolshoy
seats, where I sat (how strange fate can be!) not long after a murder
investigation in my Moscow dorm.
Sometimes I wonder if it’s odd that I’ve focused so much on
genres in recent months. But it makes complete sense. Thinking about genres
doesn’t just order my reading a bit more than usual, it also helps me make
sense of my thoughts and feelings about what’s happening in the world. When
there’s instability, I tend to seek resolutions, something detective novels
often supply. When there are real-life oddities that I simply can’t fathom, it
helps to read about (other) strange physical and psychic places: weird fiction has
already saved the day many times! And when I’m looking for something more
philosophical about history and the passage of time, novels like Vodolazkin’s –
which are so much a part of my thinking anyway, after translating three – feel
reassuring and even consoling, particularly given that they include elements of
fantasy and mysticism. Perhaps the greatest reassurance and consolation I
receive from books – from every book I read, whether I finish or not – is the
gift of opportunities to keep thinking about literary strictures, structures, characters,
and messages, all of which help me both escape and find perspective on current events that keep
proving (cliché alert!) that truth really can be far stranger than fiction.
Up Next: I’m reading away but not quite sure what comes
next! (Alienation seems to be a strong theme, though…) A post about NOSE Award
winners must be in the cards soon, too.
Disclaimers and Disclosures: The usual.
Eugene Vodolazkin sent me an electronic copy of Island. Translator Julia Meitov
Hersey is an online friend whom I hope to meet (we don’t even live far apart!)
once this mess is finally over.