It’s been years, literally years, since I’ve written an
alphabet post: I left off with the titanic letter
T in July 2014. And then I struggled with the letter У/U, just as I had struggled with O
earlier, because I simply didn’t have enough favorite authors to compile a post.
I decided to skip a few letters after one of you asked me last week when there would
be another alphabet post: since I’d already skipped O (and something else, too,
I think…), I decided not to bother with У/U or Ф/F, either,
at least for the time being. Hence we’ve arrived at Х, the letter often represented in English
as Kh.
And what a productive letter Х/Kh is! My first Kh author to
mention is Mikhail Kheraskov,
an eighteenth-century writer I studied in grad school. It wasn’t Kheraskov’s Rossiad—a classic epic poem that was/is
evidently in school curricula—that drew me, though, but his plays, which
Wikipedia rightfully says have been “neglected by posterity.” Kheraskov’s Гонимыя (in the old orthography; I called it The Persecuted in English) was not only the reason I learned how to
use a microfiche machine: it was also a good lesson about the literary
transition from sentimentalism to classicism. And literary influences. Kheraskov
contributed to my love of sentimentalism—The
Persecuted’s title pages call it a “teary drama”—and it was his work that
got me interested in analyzing literary genres. That’s more than enough to make
him a favorite.
One of my favorite contemporary authors, Margarita Khemlin, who died
a very young death in autumn 2015, is the first writer whose work I loved so
much I had to translate it. I’ve enjoyed her long and short stories, and her
novels, too, and am very happy I’ll be starting work on her Klotsvog (previous
post), for the Russian Library at Columbia University Press, in June. I’ve
always admired Margarita’s ability to write about the damage of World War 2 and
Jewish heritage with humor, grit, and grace. And I can’t wait to create an
English-language voice for Maya, the narrator (and title character) of Klotsvog, my favorite of Margarita’s
novels. (Favorite that I’ve read at this writing, anyway: a new one was recently published posthumously.)
I missed her terribly when I was in Moscow last fall and think about her
constantly: her trust in me years ago means a lot to me as a person and as a
translator. And I always loved her sense of humor as a person. (Her husband and
sister both took to calling me Becky Thatcher, too.) Melanie Moore translated The Investigator (Дознаватель),
which earned excellent reviews and was published by Glagoslav.
Khlebnikov's grave, Moscow, November 2012, my fuzzy photo |
Х is an unusual letter for me because nearly all the Kh authors
on my shelf are favorites. The only writer left unread is Boris Khazanov: I have a collection that a friend borrowed and enjoyed
very much.
Up Next: An Afanasy
Mamedov novella set in Baku. Kir Bulychev’s Поселок (known
in English as Those Who Survive): I
read very little science fiction (I’ve failed on nearly every attempt at
reading the Strugatsky Brothers) but enjoy it when I find something that suits my
taste. This Bulychev book feels like a perfect fit for a very frenetic time. I’ll
also be doing some preparatory reading before participating in Russian Literature
Week events in early May. And I’m still plugging away with Crime and Punishment, though may
switch to Oliver Ready’s translation of the novel, which I enjoy reading much
more than Dostoevsky’s original, which I’ve been rereading as a remedial
measure and as a prelude to reading Robert Belknap’s Plots, which discusses C&P
as well as King Lear…
Disclaimers: The usual,
including knowing the translators mentioned in this post.
Oh, thanks!
ReplyDeleteThe Ready C&P really does have a lot of energy.
The thanks go to you, Amateur Reader (Tom), I enjoy your posts very much! And yes, Oliver's C&P has a lot of energy. Another translator and I were talking a few months ago about how much we enjoyed seeing how Oliver resolved knotty translation issues--that, I think, is why I enjoy his translation (so much!) more than the original. It's just plain fun to see the successes.
DeleteAnd it's very funny that you mentioned the microfiche machine on Twitter: I'd never used one, let alone made copies using one, before the eighteenth-century literature course. Those materials were hard to come by then... now I wonder how much might be available online, as PDFs.
Yay, an alphabet post! I have no names to add, but I'm amused to see Kheraskov’s Rossiad mentioned, since I've just been rereading Aksakov's wonderful Детские годы Багрова-внука, which is where I first encountered Kheraskov -- I found Aksakov's enthusiasm infectious and greatly enjoyed his quotes from the poem!
ReplyDeleteI was glad to write it, Languagehat, thank you for mentioning the alphabet posts! Perhaps this coincidence (?) about Rossiad portends said epic poem making its way into your reading?
DeleteI have to say that I felt a big twinge of something akin to nostalgia when I went through my eighteenth-century literature materials on Sunday. I loved my eighteenth-century Russian literature course, probably in large part because the works don't get much attention, meaning there was an element of discovery that I just didn't feel when studying, say, Pushkin or Mandelshtam. (That element of discovery is, of course, one of the reasons so much of my reading centers around contemporary Russian novels... it's a strange way to get one's thrills, I know!)
Yes, that's what hooked me on my reading of early Russian literature; so much has been undeservedly forgotten and is a thrill to rediscover.
DeleteGreat heavens, how could I forget Mark Kharitonov? His Lines of Fate won the very first Booker, in 1992!
ReplyDeleteIt's funny, Languagehat, I forgot about Kharitonov, too, though I have two of his books, including Lines of Fate, on the shelf! Have you read him? I have not.
ReplyDeleteNo, I haven't, even though I too have two of his books, including Lines of Fate, on the shelf! That's doubtless why I didn't think of him. I'm looking forward to reading him, though; he sounds like my kind of writer.
DeleteI read it last year and had mixed feelings,
DeleteLanguagehat, thank you for mentioning this! I gave it a try at some point during the last five years, too, and it didn't grab me...
Delete