Saturday, August 15, 2015

A Lazy Summer Post: Elena Minkina-Taycher’s The Rebinder Effect

I didn’t expect to take such a long break from blogging during (and even after) my last month of translating Vadim Levental’s Masha Regina (previous post), which I turned in at the end of July to Oneworld Publications. Masha Regina, though, wormed its/her way even further into my head than I’d expected (a very good thing), brain fatigue set in (not such a good thing), and one evening a bat even settled, albeit very temporarily, in a flower pot on top of the office module of Lizok’s Bookshelf (not a good thing at all). Sometimes taking naps, feeding cats (not always as easy as it sounds), pulling weeds, and staring into space is about all I can handle during my time off. I did keep reading—slower than usual—but feel like a happier person now that I’m back to my usual pace. And back to blogging. At least until I finish the next book, Eugene Vodolazkin’s Solovyov and Larionov, which is due, also to Oneworld, at the end of February 2016.

When I was reading Elena Minkina-Taycher’s Эффект Ребиндера (The Rebinder Effect) earlier this summer, I often found myself describing the reading as “pleasant”: the book reads smoothly and easily, which is just the thing for busy times, and it left me with a peculiarly homier, fuzzier, and vaguer impression than most books. Rebinder is a novel told in episodic chapters, each of which is titled by a line from Pushkin’s poetry. Minkina-Taycher’s literary agency is not, of course, wrong in using the term “family saga” to describe the book, though it covers multiple, intertwining families whose members include a doctor, a musician, scientists, well-to-do people, a boy from an orphanage, and people with ties to far-away France. (The agency’s description also nicely summarizes the Rebinder Effect; a big thank you to them for taking care of that!) In some senses, The Rebinder Effect feels more like a saga of the entire human family than a saga of one family with a common name. I suppose that’s probably why it left me with that slightly fuzzy, vague sense.

I’ll ‘fess up: books with lots of characters often create problems for me because I have trouble keeping track of who’s who, but that mattered less than usual with Rebinder. I didn’t always remember each figure by name, even when I was reading, but everybody felt clear enough at the time, based on context. The book’s strong sense of family—in that sense of “humanity” or “mankind”—felt more important anyway, even as Minkina-Taycher’s characters were affected by historical events including dekulakization, the doctors’ plot, and the Chernobyl nuclear plant accident. Despite important historical events, it always felt that what mattered most were personal relationships and histories, and doing normal human things like dancing a crazed twist, discussing opinions of poets in the sixties, and taking camping trips. Characters love, characters live, characters die. And they’re resilient, as per the Effect.

I think Rebinder has its strongest effect in its first half, where the tones feel almost like sepia and the real-life past has had a chance to settle into history. (Or should that be vice versa?) In earlier chapters, characters love, live, and die as, for example, residents of communal living spaces, as classmates at school after one girl’s mother is targeted by the state, and as people caring for one another during difficult times. Those chapters felt more self-assured to me than some later chapters: it seemed as if the balance between historical events and characters shifted a little and Minkina-Taycher’s hand grew heavier. The Chernobyl chapter, for example, felt particularly contrived because a character happened to be nearby when the accident began; the outcome was obvious. Despite those misgivings, The Rebinder Effect is very decent mainstream fiction—something I don’t write to damn with faint praise—that makes for good, personable, low-key company thanks to Minkina-Taycher’s focus on characters primarily as people. People who need to be people.

Since there’s been previous discussion of electronic reading on the blog, I’ll also note that I read The Rebinder Effect on a new device. First off, my demands for a device on which to read. Since I seem to do best reading electronically when I have a PDF that shows a book’s layout, I wanted a reader with a screen large enough to display an entire PDF page. This creates the illusion (*sigh*) that I’m reading an old-fashioned book printed on paper. I wanted a reader with a matte screen. I wanted a reader that didn’t cost much. Okay, I wanted it to be very, very cheap. I wanted a reader that wouldn’t be cumbersome to hold or carry. I wanted a reader that wouldn’t advertise anything. My dream reader might well be the PocketBook InkPad, which gets fantastic reviews but is expensive and not readily available in the US. After a lot of Internet research and some spins around local stores with very limited options, imagine my surprise when I ended up with something that’s super-cheap and readily available, but gets not-so-great reviews: a Nextbook Ares 8 tablet from Walmart! So far, after more than two months of solid reading on the Ares 8, I’m very happy with it after slapping on a nonglare screen protector. The Ares 8 is the perfect size, pretty much the same as a typical book page, and it’s easy to hold, too. Equally important: I found a PDF app, also rather obscure, that works very well for my needs. Xodo SmartQ crops PDFs easily, turns pages nicely, and offers good annotation features. Not all PDF apps generate lists of annotations but XodoSmartQ’s lists are always accessible. (Foxit, my second-favorite PDF reader, only generates lists on demand, which is ridiculously cumbersome.) I don’t think I’d recommend the Ares 8 for much other than unusual uses like mine: it’s an easy-to-use Android device and seems sturdier than average, but Internet searches are pretty slow in either Chrome or Firefox. Finally, for the record, despite being happy with the Nextbook—and enjoying electronic reading more than I ever have—I’d still much, much rather read books on paper than electronic files.

Up next: Narine Abgaryan’s Three Apples Fell From the Sky and Guzel’ Iakhina’s Zuleikha Opens Her Eyes, both of which I enjoyed tremendously. Zuleikha is the first of the Big Book finalists that I’ll write about; Roman Senchin’s Flood Zone, which I’m reading now and seems only so-so after about 100 pages, will be the second.

Disclaimers: The usual. I received an electronic copy of The Rebinder Effect from Banke, Goumen & Smirnova Literary Agency. Thank you!

6 comments:

  1. I can't wait for your review of Narine Abgaryan. I am the one who asked you about Манюня books, and I enjoyed her writing: warm, colloquial, somewhat nostalgic, and always hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment, jkdenne, Apples is a lovely book and I'm looking forward to writing about it and figuring out more of why I enjoyed it so much!))

      Delete
  2. There must be an authorial trick to writing a novel with a large cast of characters and keeping all the characters memorable. Typically past 5 characters and I can't remember who is who. Obviously having distinct characters helps, but I suspect it is also keeping the characters closely tied to a setting or event so that when you switch back to them you "Who is so and so? Oh, yeah the gal in the broke down car."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You put this very well, russell1200 -- I'm glad it's not just me. Yes, I think it was settings and events that helped me sort through the characters in Rebinder. I had similar thought processes sometimes as I read, running through chains of events and people!

      Delete
  3. I had to give up "Flood Zone". Sounded like a stylization of Rasputin's "Прощание с Матерой", and I just couldn't get the point of doing it. Was very disappointed, as I really liked "Елтышевы".
    Will definitely check out Abgaryan
    and Iakhina.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am so with you about Flood Zone! I couldn't finish it, either: it felt contrived, derivative, obvious, and, honestly, tedious. It was very disappointing. I hope you like Abgaryan and/or Iakhina more!

      Delete